In the absence of «actual issuers» of the «scam tokens,» the plaintiffs argued that Uniswap facilitated the trades at issue by “providing a marketplace and facilities for bringing together buyers and sellers of securities» for a transaction fee, «hoping that this Court might overlook the fact that the current state of cryptocurrency regulation leaves them without recourse, at least as to the specific claims alleged in this suit.»
Check Also
Stablecoins: Roman Coins or Spanish Doubloons for the Modern Era
By 1900, colonialism had seen the adoption of currencies, or at least local derivations, of …